after looking over that recent docket (4033) i believe, in large part, shc will have its a$$ handed to it by judge drain.
shc's claim it carved out 13 parcels at hoffman estates certainly does not seem to be supported by the language in the agreement.
shc's claims that transform breached the apa also seems to be refuted by chapter and verse in transform's rebuttal.
while the judge will have to wade through the complaint, rebuttal, and go back to the apa, i just don't think shc has a strong position against transform.
for each count on which transform is able to prevail, seems that is just another nail in shc's coffin toward administrative insolvency or the judge sending this to chapt 7 with the appointment of a trustee to oversee the winding down and ultimate demise of shc.
the $hit $how continues.
