I like using pure logic.
If there was no Adcom the first time would just about everyone here fear it would occur now?
In my area of expertise, since there was already one Adcom the likelihood of a second has greatly diminished. Added the lawsuit which they lost to the equation and the likelihood of a second Adcom diminishes even further, nobody likes loosing twice. Vengeance is illogical and is bad advertising.
Most here expect another Adcom simply because there was one that occurred already, but what if it didn't, what would you all expect to happen this time?
One must be totally unemotional, because that is what I think is affecting you all, your emotions are influencing you, you got burnt once so you remember it and fear getting burnt again but statistically speaking you shouldn't since you learned from your experience. The FDA learned from their experience, they made a mistake, the likelihood of them blindly repeating their mistake again is illogical. And the likelihood of a second Adcom is far lower than having one. It is akin to having a major earthquake in the exact same place twice.
Just keep repeating after me while looking at the swinging gold pendulum, There Will Be No Adcom....There Will Be No Adcom.......There Will Be No Adcom.
I joke but that is what it is like reading all your posts, just because one Adcom occurred doesn't mean a second one for the same indications will occur especially after all the testing and the better outcomes i.e. things have changed dramatically and nobody is even taking that fact into consideration.
Y'all are just cracking and getting weak kneed.
GLTA
