Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[prototype_101]

Inversor, thanks for posting this reply,

Lightwave: This testing was described by a board member to give an example of common expectations and practices that explain why not everything can be accelerated by working harder. For telecom/datacom optics, this is a standard practice and so these sorts of timescales are typical.

But it is not a simple one time start, pass the time and then end. So I can say we have started but you should not infer that 5000 hours later we are done for good. Equally, it is incorrect to infer that we cannot do anything else until these 2000 or 5000 hours are done. Our goal is not to check off a piece of paperwork, our goal is to build confidence in the platform.

So my interpretation is that the 2000/5000 hours are fairly linear but that doesn't mean that the Tier 1's won't throw additional testings into the mix along the way, so maybe at 1000/2000 hours and everything is performing rock solid, then they throw a few more advanced tactics to try and "break" it, then if it still survives onward to say 2000/3000 hours then perhaps an even tougher set of trials/challenges are thrown at it, and so on until the Tier 1 at some point says "WoW just Wow" and then LWLG inks a HUGE deal for "design-in"

Let's not forget that LWLG's strong suit has always been STABILITY, so I would expect no problems in Reliability testing, and I believe the quote from the ASM by Dr Leonberger adds greatly to confidence of impending success

Fred Leonberger: Great to see him there. He was very enthusiastic and said the data will come and "it will be great."