InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 5358
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/16/2013

Re: JerryCampbell post# 228189

Monday, 05/20/2019 6:48:19 PM

Monday, May 20, 2019 6:48:19 PM

Post# of 712008
YOU claimed that NW simply didn't perform basic due diligence and his alleged attempt to get NWBO on the cheap was "fantasy". I just expressed my view (not fact) that the "fantasy" was to claim NW would drop $150 million with out learning, via a google search, what messageboard posters already knew. The p5 report was out for months WITH NO IMPACT ON THE STOCK PRICE until NW made it an issue.

My claim is that NW is well connected with billions to manage. He has resources, connections and know-how. To suggest that he'd drop $150 million on NWBO without ANY due diligence is a stretch of the imagination. If he did this, he should be retired. The only reasonable explanation here, imho (and I am not stating it as fact), is NW used the bogus p5 report as a tool to force NWBO/LP into an untenable position that would have ultimately resulted in his getting the company on the cheap or, at the very least, having significant control of the board.

Yes there is "zero precedent in his history, and which is completely outside his competence". But, the unprecedented opportunity NWBO/DCVAX provides would, in my estimation, be worth the risk. Additionally, given the vast resources/connections NW has at his disposal, wouldn't you think he could staff up that expertise rather easily? I do.

Woodford is a long-only portfolio manager. He is not a vulture investor, private equity, LBO, IBanker, or anything of the sort.

You are claiming with apparent certainty that he would do something for which there is zero precedent in his history, and which is completely outside his competence.

That makes no sense.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News