Friday, May 17, 2019 7:54:20 AM
SGSI is a perfect example of abuse of those voting rights.
September 10 2018 SGSI did a RS of 200 to 1, reducing the common shares to 1.1 million.
8 month later there are 32 million NEW outstanding shares, yet the two directors retain majority voting rights.
It would seem that if the system was set up fairly that when the common shareholder was reduced by 200 to 1 the voting power of the 2 directors should have also been diluted 200 to 1.
Which would have resulted in the 2 directors no longer controlling majority voting rights over the company.
IMHO, this result in SGSI actually being a privately held company by the 2 directors as the new shareholders owning 97% of the post split company shares have no voting right what so ever.
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM