Friday, May 17, 2019 7:54:20 AM
SGSI is a perfect example of abuse of those voting rights.
September 10 2018 SGSI did a RS of 200 to 1, reducing the common shares to 1.1 million.
8 month later there are 32 million NEW outstanding shares, yet the two directors retain majority voting rights.
It would seem that if the system was set up fairly that when the common shareholder was reduced by 200 to 1 the voting power of the 2 directors should have also been diluted 200 to 1.
Which would have resulted in the 2 directors no longer controlling majority voting rights over the company.
IMHO, this result in SGSI actually being a privately held company by the 2 directors as the new shareholders owning 97% of the post split company shares have no voting right what so ever.
Recent HWNI News
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/11/2024 04:53:33 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/20/2024 08:15:45 PM
VHAI - Vocodia Partners with Leading Political Super PACs to Revolutionize Fundraising Efforts • VHAI • Sep 19, 2024 11:48 AM
Dear Cashmere Group Holding Co. AKA Swifty Global Signs Binding Letter of Intent to be Acquired by Signing Day Sports • DRCR • Sep 19, 2024 10:26 AM
HealthLynked Launches Virtual Urgent Care Through Partnership with Lyric Health. • HLYK • Sep 19, 2024 8:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Appoints Kevin Arias as Advisor to the Board of Directors, Strengthening Strategic Leadership • ELMGF • Sep 18, 2024 10:29 AM
Mawson Finland Limited Further Expands the Known Mineralized Zones at Rajapalot: Palokas step-out drills 7 metres @ 9.1 g/t gold & 706 ppm cobalt • MFL • Sep 17, 2024 9:02 AM
PickleJar Announces Integration With OptCulture to Deliver Holistic Fan Experiences at Venue Point of Sale • PKLE • Sep 17, 2024 8:00 AM