InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 422
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/30/2004

Re: yinser post# 58914

Friday, 11/17/2006 9:30:02 AM

Friday, November 17, 2006 9:30:02 AM

Post# of 173737
MVCO

Yinser, the $500 million of bidding refered to in the conf. call was just for contracts/jobs exceeding $20 million MVCO has a thriving business in the under $20 million category, but they needed the bonding capacity to go after more larger projects. As much as I hated the 20% dilution of the secondary, and it's pricing, the 33% increase in bonding capacity is critical for growth.

What interested me more about the conf call, and I may followup with a phone call to the CFO, is the two large claims that MVCO has outstanding, each of which could result in $0 to over $6 million to MVCO. I assume MVCO has already expensed the work, the claims are not receivables until they settle or win an award, and anything received could flow to the bottom line. I think MVCO is one of the most undervalued construction companies out there. They just need to get larger.

Tmcal

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.