Followers | 88 |
Posts | 7607 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 02/02/2015 |
Tuesday, May 14, 2019 5:01:25 PM
It was done quite a few times pre-split, as you and I witnessed traders willing to accept .00001 for their shares just to get the hell out of here. Why a trader wouldn't have some patience currently, post-split, to see what is to unfold, I can't answer. >>
The original poster who started this thread, I asked why I haven't seen his order to sell at .90 on the ask. I'm still waiting for a reply. Regarding current trading >>
Once again, haven't a clue, but today the trading action seemed to settle mid-way between the bid and the ask. There were quite a few trades, (sells), at .405, broken up in varying lots ranging from 1 share to 531 shares. I suspect that was an AON order and the MM filled the order possibly out of a personal inventory he/she was willing to use to execute the trade. If MM's bought shares at .15, sure, why not sell them at .405. However >>
What if that was a market order? That's what the original poster claimed -- that etrade told him market orders take precedence over limit orders. That would be true. Here 's where I get confused >>
If folks are willing to place market orders, they are telling the MM "I'm willing to take whatever you'll give me or whatever you can get for me."
It is counter-intuitive for me to think an MM would give that trader .405 or .90 or .95 -- when the MM could simply give the trader .15 -- then, take those .15 shares and fill the order for a trader who is willing to pay more than .15. There were two trades, (buys), today at .94 -- so some folks are willing to pay a premium. I'm not sure they are very smart traders at this point, considering how little we know about what is to unfold. If I was going to buy (IF) -- I'd put an order on the bid at .01 and no higher. But that's just me. However, I'm not buying one share at any price until I see something from this me company. I haven't seen anything yet. Those PR's have been fluff and nothing more than fluff.
Recent GSFI News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/20/2023 10:20:24 PM
- Form NT 10-Q - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-Q or 10-QSB • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 12/14/2023 09:40:35 PM
- Form SEC STAFF ACTION - SEC Staff Action: ORDER • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/29/2023 10:00:04 PM
- Form 10-Q/A - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)]: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/21/2023 04:01:44 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/20/2023 07:56:51 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/15/2023 08:28:51 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/31/2023 03:09:06 PM
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM