InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 241
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/04/2018

Re: I-Glow post# 67278

Tuesday, 05/14/2019 7:49:31 AM

Tuesday, May 14, 2019 7:49:31 AM

Post# of 96905
You do understand that the courts gave a big win to Chanbond and all patent owners. This ruling effectively stops "losers" at the PTAB from filing unlimited IPR's when they could not prove an interest in those patents.

RPX made money by selling "insurance" to patent infringers even though they had no interest. Their business model was to keep filing IPR's to bankrupt patent owners or get lucky and get a win from an inexperienced PTAB judge.

BTW - a study has shown that the PTAB judges are far less experienced than the judges hearing patent cases in the Federal Circuit courts. Some PTAB judges got the job after just 2 years out of law school. Compare that against Chanbond trial judge Andrews with 30 years on the bench.
The impressive win record of UOIP/Chanbond will continue - next up is the "slap down" of Arris by the Courts in their request for en banc review of their loss at PTAB. USPTO Director has already submitted his opinion that Arris appeal should be denied because they have no legal standing for an appeal.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.