SiNtx Technologies Inc (SINT)

[SmokerX]

Renal Toxicity Induced by TiO2..accumulation of TiO2 in the liver.

Im no expert but anything that puts load on the liver is usually deemed to increase risk of liver cancer. Perhaps in relation to my supposition on bioload of foreign bodies leading to increase risk of cancer through an immune system effect? Let's see what I can drum up.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3423755/

TiO2 nanoparticles predominantly cause adverse effects via induction of oxidative stress resulting in cell damage, genotoxicity, inflammation, immune response etc. The extent and type of damage strongly depends on physical and chemical characteristics of TiO2 nanoparticles, which govern their bioavailability and reactivity. Based on the experimental evidence from animal inhalation studies TiO2 nanoparticles are classified as “possible carcinogenic to humans” by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and as occupational carcinogen by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. The studies on dermal exposure to TiO2 nanoparticles, which is in humans substantial through the use of sunscreens, generally indicate negligible transdermal penetration; however data are needed on long-term exposure and potential adverse effects of photo-oxidation products. Although TiO2 is permitted as an additive (E171) in food and pharmaceutical products we do not have reliable data on its absorption, distribution, excretion and toxicity on oral exposure. TiO2 may also enter environment, and while it exerts low acute toxicity to aquatic organisms, upon long-term exposure it induces a range of sub-lethal effects.

So that last bit I highlighted. "TIO2 is so safe. put it on your donuts bro" That's not what the data suggests. The data suggests we have no data and just put it on donuts anyway. Second, This is not equivalent to oral exposure. With implants this seems more equivalent to a TIO2 Junkie. a chronic intravenous TIO2 user.

Since your body needs electrolyte it seems rational to compare this to a salty environment:

Titanium tubing that is exposed for 16 years to polluted seawater in a surface condenser was slightly discolored but showed no evidence of corrosion. Titanium has provided over thirty years of trouble-free seawater service for the chemical, oil refining, and desalination industries. Exposure of titanium for many years to depths of over a mile below the ocean surface has not produced any measurable corrosion. Pitting and crevice corrosion are totally absent, even if marine deposits form. The presence of sulfides in seawater does not affect the resistance of titanium to corrosion. Exposure of titanium to marine atmospheres or splash or tide zone does not cause corrosion.

What about when we expose this to electrolysis? Salt water seems to be an incomplete comparison to implants in the organism. Not only is it comparable to a salt or brine water environment but there's electrolysis taking place and an immune system attempting to absorb it.

Without electricity, you wouldn't be reading this article right now. And it's not because your computer wouldn't work. It's because your brain wouldn't work.

Everything we do is controlled and enabled by electrical signals running through our bodies.

Resting cells are negatively charged on the inside, while the outside environment is more positively charged. This is due to a slight imbalance between positive and negative ions inside and outside the cell. Cells can achieve this charge separation by allowing charged ions to flow in and out through the membrane.

So I assume an implant dropped into the "outside environment" would take on the positive charge. An anode.

Used as an anode, a normal untreated piece of titanium metal will "anodize", forming a non-conductive titanium dioxide coating.

The experimental results showed that titanium can be used as cathode, but it is an inadequate material for the manufacturing of the anodes in cells of seawater electrolysis without activation with electrocatalytic oxide films, because shows the high polarisation for the anodic process.

This is a passive equivalent negating the active environment of the organism attempting to rid itself of a foreign body. Negating this, it still sounds like a bad idea.

However, we're dealing with a society that needs to get woke on chrome cobalt, so understanding Titanium seems to be beyond the scope here. Also it seems the burden of proof is on us. Not the manufacturers of implantable titanium to prove a safe device. I wouldn't trust it. These guys have a tract record for unsafe devices with chrome cobalt.

Like some kind of "safe hands" "trusted hands" insurance commercial with these guys. My take is not to have the questionable device implanted in the first place, then having the burden of proof placed on you in a court of law down the road to prove why it did or did not give you liver cancer or immune reaction.