Yes, their theories are arguments that the tech was prior art. Not sure why they call them theories, except that maybe it sounds better than argument.
The agreement was not made through, or recorded with, the court but apparently was an agreement made during an email exchange (i.e , the redacted exhibits on the last filings). At least not until Chanbond raised the issue at the end of expert discovery asking the judge to dismiss the last theory based on the agreement between the two parties.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.