Face it Ladies and Gentlemen: Everybody in this board or the like who posts, either endlessly 24/7 for years or occasionally, or who comes and goes all the time, is aiming at cheap shares either directly or indirectly (those who do so by heeding to the work orders of their funds so they may not be direct shareholders of this wonderful company and who can readily claim to have no shares at all despite posting tirelessly, either part of the wolfpack or not).
The problem or truth is the greed, which on one hand prevents an ordinary retail investor from seeing the forest for the trees despite being surrounded by cheap shares. In this regard, those without shares but posting tirelessly have accomplished their work preventing the share price from having higher pressure to rise; it's the same problem of the greed, which also prevents the funds from taking initial and/or substantial positions before everything is crystal clear by pivotal data despite their tireless efforts preparing the market to the eventuality of a successful trial. When the time comes, they may still debate the results hoping that the market cannot distinguish between days and nights, so they may still argue the share price can only rise to such a level such as $1 or 2$ even if the market having a stellar data in its face because the price simply cannot jump too high from a relative low level such as $0.3 or $0.5. What a faulty logic!
The utmost purpose is of course cheap shares. When they work hard to warn the market, they will be busy accumulating the cheap shares by their definitions. With some undeniable data, they may also forget the market may be manipulated in some conditions but it cannot be in other conditions and forever.
So the chance is that they will be overwhelmed by a tide wave of huge share price normalization supported by the general market. As to how high the share price can rise, the best reference is clearly the market cap of other similar companies, and such examples are plenty, anywhere in the range from around $5 billion to $20 billion.
Yes, we may not be able to take over a market cap of $10 billion (roughly equal to $10 ~ $15 per share on fully diluted base) for example right away or within a short period of time after undeniable data are released, but to say $1 or $2 is the ceiling on such occasion is utterly absurd, but if the reality is otherwise, then get dry powder ready, and there is not other way to do it: get in big!
Too many people are hoping to get in cheap without taking any due risks, and for that something is definitely not right!
Are the two still blinded data sets released still not enough to de-risk? Then I would say it's the greed and a dumb greed that has blinded you!
BTW, I still expect a huge short squeeze is in the working!
AI
