InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 19489
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: sjratty post# 171397

Wednesday, 11/15/2006 1:16:48 PM

Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:16:48 PM

Post# of 432954
Thanks for the new input..It appears that my prior post was wrong..The U.S. has adopted the Continental procedure!!!!

Posted by: mschere
In reply to: olddog967 who wrote msg# 171279 Date:11/13/2006 2:33:57 PM
Post #of 171403

Thanks for the input..I believe the U.S. Court system shares the same Court procedures as the British..

Kevin Mooney, a partner of Simmons & Simmons and president of EPLAW, said the proposed procedures are "much more continental than British" with oral hearings designed to be concluded in just one day. "It is a very front-loaded procedure, with the arguments and evidence up front, not at the last stage."

PACER: Delaware

There was an interesting special order entered yesterday. Apparently, the parties were fighting over whether Nokia had to first identify which patents are not essential and state why IDCC acted in bad faith in saying that it is, or whether IDCC has to first identify which patents are essential and provide prove of that. IDCC won this issue, and Nokia must, within 30 days, identify all patents that it contends are not essential and state why IDCC acted in bad faith that it is. IDCC also defeated Nokias attempts to get other discovery, such as settlement negotiation docs.



mschere

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News