InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1269
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2018

Re: BBboy post# 168836

Wednesday, 03/06/2019 10:21:53 PM

Wednesday, March 06, 2019 10:21:53 PM

Post# of 232879
I never said This about Li. In fact, I said he is smarter than you and I. People are trying to put words in my mouth. I don’t call names. I see things in black and white. The upgrade was completely unexpected. And the soiling issued with transformer and all else with permits too. While that was “waiting” money was being burnt. That’s what I said. I said this should have been a contingent factor when looking at a mfg building. That’s how things would look if you are scaling a business; however, someone overlooked this or the plan was never really to scale LF. Both have reality in them. As for Eontec and 106c and all this CE jazz, that conversation should be restricted on this board. There is no beef. It’s just fantasy. No CE. No 106c agreement in the 10k. Focus elsewhere. LQMT will NOT see CE revenue. I’ve been asking for someone to show me an agreement on 106c and revenue for months. All we get is cool emails from Eontec with decoding and pontification of what one wants to believe. Now, about medical and automotive, let’s talk..
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News