InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 113
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/08/2017

Re: A deleted message

Saturday, 03/02/2019 5:01:53 PM

Saturday, March 02, 2019 5:01:53 PM

Post# of 235079
The relationship of CSI and ACS is awfully similar to the relationship of Strikeforce and Blocksafe. Private companies with private contracts, both of which screw Strikeforce out of revenue.

ACS gets paid. Must channel through CSI. And then CSI to pay SFOR. Strikeforce has not received a dime from this relationship. Where is the money going that Bo tells the world about from Mcafee and all other relationships? Certainly not to Strikeforce.

Similarly, BSAFE is private, is able to utilize Strikeforce patents for a small fee, and keep all the revenues. And shareholders will never see a dime from it. Why does Strikeforce pay all BSAFE expenses but only receives a “fee” for services? Seems quite backwards.

Mods, pumpers, and dilusionists can try and say otherwise (or delete), but they can’t cover up the truth. This house of cards is starting to show its true shape.