Home > Boards > US OTC > Retail - Wholesale Distributors > Banneker Inc. (BANI)

Here is an eyewitness to what was here

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
SecretMillionaire Member Profile
 
Followed By 10
Posts 338
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/04/18
160x600 placeholder
SecretMillionaire   Thursday, 02/21/19 08:59:54 PM
Re: makinezmoney post# 8247
Post # of 8346 
Here is an eyewitness to what was here before, in the post I'm referring to:

$BANI: YAHOOOooo... 41Billion Shares OUTSTANDING

PURE GARBAGE.

AVOID AT ALL COSTS !!!!!!!!!


So there you have it. The OS is the same. It's just updated. Makinez, do you remember if this ticker had a skull and crossbones on it before? Or was it always a stop sign?

Why would there be so many restricted shares? Restricted means can't be sold. I was looking at this as mass dilution. But did a huge block come later, given to some person(s) recently? As in the last few years?

Well, I can actually look at the last filing in 2014. It says AS was 49.8B but OS at that time was 10.2B. I don't know. How would 8B shares of that OS become restricted? I don't understand. Or was it always restricted? And if so, why would it still be restricted after all this time? I don't know.

IFFF there was an issuance to some person(s) in the billions in the last couple of years, that would be evidence of a planned reverse split to me. That would be proportionately cutting up the pie, because everybody would go through the r/s equally. Maybe they want time for restrictions to expire, do an r/s and be freely traded with better physics. I don't know. I don't know all the rules.

Or was BANI issuing shares like a printing press, diluting the pool. That used to be possible in the '90s easily. I think the rules are more strict. I don't know if they can easily do that. And if they did, that wouldnt' explain why they are restricted as I understand things.

My broker can pull up a chart that goes back to '14. There was no increase in price. No pumping going on, so I don't think running the printing press would explain the huge jump. I kinda lean to a large chunk of shares, a 4/5 ration, was given to some person(s). That would seem to be an alignment of interests to me, IFFF it happened that way. It's impossible to see. But if so, I would think they had an rs planned all along. And I would like that, IFFF that's the case.

All I know is I want to be a part of this story. I feel like they would prefer to do an rs. Some of our speculators here would wrongly feel that's not a good idea, but they would be wrong.



Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist