InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 2241
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2017

Re: CogDiss 1188X post# 213393

Thursday, 02/07/2019 10:48:48 AM

Thursday, February 07, 2019 10:48:48 AM

Post# of 701429
LOL,

"Relative Risk"

While it can be a useful measure. Everything must be taken in context. Sure 6% is 50% better than 4% (relatively) but in reality it is not much more than a rounding error in absolute terms. I mean 12 vs 10 is only a 20% difference. They could wait until it was 1% vs 3% and they would have a 200% RRR but it wouldn't be meaningful.


Wonder what the "Relative Risk" reduction of death will be in the DCVAX arm a5 5 years? 200-300%? 5 vs 15-20?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News