InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 740
Posts 61469
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 10/05/2009

Re: drugmanrx post# 56314

Sunday, 01/20/2019 2:04:41 PM

Sunday, January 20, 2019 2:04:41 PM

Post# of 80845
Wow, just wow! And I might add that the Preferred shares story never showed up in court till 2016, 3 years later, in a new case when they were loosing the "simple" cut and dried loan default case from 2013.

So did Joe wait till 2016 to fess up to Steve?

Did he wait 4-5- or 6 months from Dec 2012 or Feb 2013, till June 2013 to fess up that he conspired to defraud Steve?

Why wait till 2016? Why not also sue Joe for doing the same thing?

Why partner with one and sue the other when they both did the same thing?

Wowsers.

The Federal court documents you sited show that Adelstein claimed under oath(?) to the judge(?) that he called the loan in June 2013 due to the Preferred shares(?), when in fact he told the state court, by suing IFUS, 3 years earlier, that he called the loan for a late payment(?), 7 days(?) after the first payment was due with no mention of the preferred shares in the state case?

If I missed anything or got any of this wrong let me know please.
But this looks like what I see in the public record.


I repeat. READ THE COURT RECORDS

What part of Scivoletto voting for them in Dec 2012, voting to give them to himself Feb 2013, receiving them in Feb 2013 and not telling Adelstein til June 2013 is hard to understand.

IT IS ALL THERE IN BLACK AND WHITE.

Court record quote

"Unknown to Adelstein and Plaintiff, Walther caused the issuance of the preferred shares in February 2013. D.E. 84-4."

"the issuance of 666 shares of Series “A” Preferred Shares to each of the following: ....... RMS7 (an entity controlled solely by Scivoletto), Inc., "

Quote: He did not know, when the preferred shares were issued, that Walther's purpose was to defraud Adelstein. When Walther told him, he refused to participate in the fraud and told Adelstein





SCIVOLETTO VOTED FOR THE PREFERRED SHARES DECEMBER 2012

SCIVOLETTO VOTED TO GIVE HIMSELF THOSE PREFERRED AROUND FEBRUARY 2013

SCIVOLETTO WAS IN POSSESSION OF THOSE PREFERRED SHARES SINCE FEBRUARY 2013

SCIVOLETTO ALLEGEDLY DID NOT TELL ADELSTEIN TIL JUNE 2013

We are to believe that, Scivoletto voted for the preferred voting shares but did not know what there purpose was?

We are to believe what, Scivoletto voted to give himself the preferred voting shares and accepted them without knowing what there purpose was?

Right?

And I have a bridge in brooklyn I want to sell you.



All of my posts are strictly opinions and should not be considered to be facts, or investment advise. They are for entertainment purposes only.