InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 15839
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2010

Re: Notademoc post# 171890

Saturday, 01/12/2019 2:12:13 PM

Saturday, January 12, 2019 2:12:13 PM

Post# of 423895
Erm....because it's a drug? And by FDA/FDCA definitions it cannot be a DS, which is part of their ITC argument. I assume you didn't mean selling it OTC, and answer to that is obvious - cost would be too high and couldn't be offset by insurance - AMRN couldn't have helped fund R-IT if they lowered the price to a point where consumers might actually be willing to pay for it out of pocket. Plus FDA probably wouldn't have agreed to let them sell it OTC w/o any long term safety studies in hand, and they'd have made the right decision given the surprising increase in A-Fib in the V group.

The Thought Police: To censor and protect. Craig Bruce

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News