InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 72
Posts 6198
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2011

Re: Jt0082 post# 171857

Saturday, 01/12/2019 9:05:08 AM

Saturday, January 12, 2019 9:05:08 AM

Post# of 424170
jt0082, that is not my understanding. Based on my reading, the 10b5-1, if properly constructed and administered, provides a defense against the presumption that trades were made with MNPI in possession.

Terminations are permitted, but the burden is then on the individual to demonstrate that the termination wasn't made as a result of obtaining MNPI.

In this case, let's say BO discussions with Pfizer commenced on 12/15/2018, and the 10b5-1 plans were put in place after AHA in November of 2018 (which would make sense). If the deal got announced on Monday, and there was a set plan to sell x shares obtained from y option exercises at z price or better within r timeframe, and that plan got cancelled after 12/15/2018 -- and the SEC looked into it, the defense against the presumption would almost certainly fail.

So in a sense you are right -- the plans can be terminated -- but not pursuant to obtaining MNPI that is still pertinent during the planned trading period. Not without personal legal risk.

“The trick is in what one emphasizes. We either make ourselves miserable, or we make ourselves happy. The amount of work is the same.” Carlos Castaneda

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News