Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[SonamKapoor]

North: Isn't copyright law complex and often judged on a case-by-case basis - I found surprising the monkey-selfie/PETA vs photographer case? I remember once a university librarian unprompted telling me while helping me copy a few pages in a book that I could copy up to some X% under the fair use doctrine.

I'm 100% supportive of the fourth estate being supported by subscribers (Ihub, too for that matter) with many friends in journalism many of whom have had to find other careers after being laid off. It's a financially rough way to "make a living." They get to live their values however. Hoo-rah.

I do find the history between AMRN and AH kind of curious - Stat's free hit/sensational/click-bait piece article the weekend of 11/10 that didn't include actual coverage of the crowd in attendance reaction at all?...and once I learned from this board the slanted history of coverage with AMRN went back to 2013 it's caused me to question the motives I initially assumed were only to be an internet provocateur.

I'm not sure what ADVFN does if anything about all the news and analyst reports that get posted to their servers to educate investors, but it is an interesting question. Maybe the mods are familiar?

My very basic view of fair use: www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html

Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use. Section 107 calls for consideration of the following four factors in evaluating a question of fair use: