InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 798
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2018

Re: boston745 post# 21185

Monday, 12/31/2018 3:09:39 PM

Monday, December 31, 2018 3:09:39 PM

Post# of 41255

How is there no corrosion or wear with this implant yet there is evidence of this in human patients? Is it an electrochemical difference?



This is an old discussion, but I have an update for more clarity. This is in regards to the implant I posted. People just throw medical trash at me so I've got more clarity on this. Obviously there's extreme PEEK wear.

The degree of peri-implant osteolysis induced by PEEK, CoCrMo, and HXLPE wear particles



https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5793374/

http://www.cafepharma.com/boards/threads/x3-triathalon-poly.382802/

So I`ll just leave these here. TLDR: PEEK particles and osteolysis. That implant was removed for loosening blamed on the dog doubling his weight, but remember he's lucky he was given a hip at all and not put down.
-------------------

Here's where it gets interesting. How is there no corrosion after 8 years? Where's the galvanic corrosion from dissimilar metal?

https://biomedtrix.com/total-hip-replacement/

Here's the manufacturer. I couldn't tell metallurgy until I learned the manufacturer

The decision to make a one-piece stem and head



BOOM! It's a one piece all Titanium The only other material was PEEK.

Aseptic loosening is caused by osteolysis caused by poly wear and debris particles.



I think this loosened in the cup where PEEK attempts to fuse to bone. Could be wrong.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SINT News