InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 413
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/28/2018

Re: sts66 post# 167294

Saturday, 12/15/2018 7:22:54 PM

Saturday, December 15, 2018 7:22:54 PM

Post# of 426647
STS: Yes, I read it - you well stated your case and I appreciated it. And you may be right.

STS, I simply think there is stickiness around the policy, industries involved and political bigwigs. This is my read on it. We don't have to agree 100% of the time do we? I mean, we're mostly pretty much in alignment on our opinions like what 95% of the time?

Practically all our foods would then be drugs is how I view it.

Soy protein isolate for example - it's everywhere you look...all the hydrolysates... etc etc. Are the artificial meats grown in labs synthetic? I think so, but to say each new tofurkey burger needs a NDI?

I'm still OK in my opinion here that this is a grey area for supplements on the market prior to Oct 1994.

I reviewed Pg 13, Section IV as below:

FDA non-binding draft guidance Aug 2016

The evidence is there in the microfilm from newspapers of that era. I mentioned a company name even who was producing. I think today's version of that 1980's company is Patheon, currently an API encapsulator for AMRN if I'm remembering my read of a 2018 10Q. My grandmother was a nurse and took menhaden EE supplements in the 1980's because she was reading the Berkeley Wellness Newsletters (some others too, but that's the only one I remember in addition to her medical books because I was a kid I didn't pay all that much attention).

Companies like to experiment and put new products out to get an edge on the next company over...what can I say? Time didn't stand still in the 80's and 90's any more than it does today.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News