Friday, December 14, 2018 2:48:23 AM
More precisely: the digital sampling is sufficient to perfectly recreate the analog signal. That is the actual purpose of sampling.
The fact that the digital sampling can do this was scientifically proven decades ago and called the Nyquist theorem.
You keep looking at an arbitrarily designed 2-dimensional abstraction of digital samples, and irrationally believe that these drawings somehow represent how the reproduced audio will actually sound.
It's as incorrect as believing you cannot correctly assemble an Ikea shelf, because the directions do not display the wood grain on the planks.
The "losses" of information in digital sampling at industry-standard rates & bit depths are so small that it's physiologically impossible for human ears to discern them.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM