InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 42446
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: spencer post# 170740

Friday, 11/03/2006 12:03:43 PM

Friday, November 03, 2006 12:03:43 PM

Post# of 432855
spencer,

That is exactly what BM said in the cc.

In the New York case we have already indicated to the court that some Samsung’s more egregious positions may be sanctional. We also have every confidence that we will prevail in the New York and secure the judgment necessary to collect the amounts due to us. We have no intention of patiently waiting for them to pay us. They have already disregarded the payment fine table in the award. Once we have a legal mechanism by which to get paid, one of which is seizure of their assets we will use it.

Now frankly, all of this effort on our part to collect amounts due should not be necessary. You would think that after having 2 different arbitration panels and a federal court all interpret the Nokia royalty provisions in the same way and with Samsung having agreed to be bound by those terms, Samsung would do the right thing and actually pay what it owes.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News