InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 1134
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/29/2014

Re: BBboy post# 161308

Monday, 11/26/2018 7:47:15 PM

Monday, November 26, 2018 7:47:15 PM

Post# of 233530
I'm guessing that most of the investors here originally bought into this stock because they thought LQMT was inherently good in and of itself.

They thought the golf ball went further, the pinball bounced higher, a knife remained sharp longer than a razor blade kept inside a pyramid, the material could be molded to closer tolerances, it was impervious to corrosion, and products were as simple to make as dropping in a cylinder of LM105 at one end of a Green Mystery Machine and at the other off rolled your new parts on that white conveyor belt. That modern technology had found a new material that is somehow metallic and glass but stronger than titanium; this was a ground floor opportunity for just pennies a share.

But now you are saying we need collaboration??? What LQMT needs is partnership in this unknown web of foreign companies that their names I can't pronounce because they have way too many vowels. The reason LQMT has not really sold a damn thing for nearly two decades is because they weren't in bed with right companies? And in the past LQMT has had poor leadership. What will make them successful is a professor. A businessman. An inventor. An industrialist. A Thomas Edison....but nobody has ever heard of him except for those here on iHop.

Collaboration to become successful.....this is a new color of unicorn....I don't know what ya' call it.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News