InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 60
Posts 3926
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/16/2016

Re: noodle post# 47906

Thursday, 11/08/2018 3:54:22 PM

Thursday, November 08, 2018 3:54:22 PM

Post# of 58279
And I've always respected your support of Jan and PGUS, noodle. Yes, we've both been around for a long time.

Is it possible that you misinterpreted something?

First, just remember this. You've been around a long time, as have I. So you PROBABLY know that a LONG TIME AGO Jan stated that he would put the share structure on the Investor page of the website, and that he would have it updated once a month. Ding Ding Ding Is it possible that Jan was simply doing the monthly update on Oct 4 (as he just did yesterday on Nov 7)? There was obviously renewed interest in seeing the O/S updated, and I an SURE Jan knew that, and wanted to be sure to let shareholders know that the page was updated with the latest O/S.

I'm not sure what you're getting at with claiming "Jan KNEW that 250,000,000 more was coming," when 597.97M + 250M = 847.97M, which is more than the 804M O/S that was just updated yesterday... and we KNOW Jan has been - as we ALL have - hoping to see that loan come through to avoid further dilution. So why would he tell you 250M more were coming? Could it be that you misunderstood or misinterpreted? That was over a month ago that you are claiming "Jan KNEW 250M more were coming."

So... you're saying that you knew on October 3rd that we were going to see 847.97M shares O/S? We're not there yet, but sure, looks like we could. So Jan somehow gave YOU that impression. And he didn't come out and tell everyone that we were going to see 250M shares added to the O/S? I just don't get this whole thing with your claim that Jan is being deceitful.

Whatever it is that gave you that impression - and I don't WANT to know inside info if that's what you have - I think you should re-examine your comments here that are factually untrue. First, Jan tries like hell to avoid giving any inside info - I know first hand, and others seem to know that: "He's not answering me" "I've called and he won't tell me diddly" etc.

We don't need to make a molehill next to the mountain. We're all disappointed to see the O/S blooming into a mountain, but we can climb that mountain with what the fundamental business of ProGreen has to offer. This molehill of accusations against the CEO is petty.

ALL IMO

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.