InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 74
Posts 15841
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2010

Re: ziploc_1 post# 153780

Friday, 11/02/2018 1:45:07 PM

Friday, November 02, 2018 1:45:07 PM

Post# of 426269
I saw that too, and thought it odd that he said by EOY because many here believe full results paper will come out in the NEJM the same weekend of the AHA presentation because NEJM doesn't publish papers that have data already presented elsewhere. So does that mean they hold back some subgroup analysis at AHA? Doesn't sound like a good idea to me. JT says something later in the transcript that may be a hint that the paper has already been accepted for publication - he uses "involved", not "involves, a past tense:

So, I think the SNDA filing isn't so much a function of our presentation at AHA, it's more a function of our bandwidth. So we have given priority to the presentation at AHA and to publication both of which involved peer review and that process we think positions us best for getting to the SNDA.



Aha - two paragraphs down he does hint that TEs may not be presented at AHA:


With respect to content at AHA, if we start talking about specifics of what we might present at AHA, we are sort of potentially violating what we promised AHA that we wouldn't do. I mean I think it's reasonable to assume that you will see data relative to the underlying pieces of the primary endpoint.


The Thought Police: To censor and protect. Craig Bruce

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News