InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 267
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/01/2017

Re: PayMEmf post# 159482

Friday, 11/02/2018 11:57:17 AM

Friday, November 02, 2018 11:57:17 AM

Post# of 233352
My stance is that I don't know and haven't seen enough to be convinced one way or the other. What I have seen is enough evidence that #4 is plausible.

The three parties had to protect themselves from being exploited by each other. That does not preclude them from striking a deal to work together. Using those restrictions as a reason to eliminate any and all possibility of cooperation is missing something.

Apple was our relationship, not Li's. Either we brought Apple to Li, or Apple brought Li to LQMT. If an agreement was struck with Apple, it isn't crazy to think that the work will flow through us. Paraclete is correct in that an additional mouth to feed would be too costly. PatentGuy is right that Li can't simply take a 10% chunk out of Eontec and give it to LQMT without some blowback from the Eon shareholders. But we could certainly book a huge revenue and a huge expense, and end up with a few hundred thousand in profit, but revenue in the tens of mullions, while Yihao makes the margin.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News