InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 3726
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2017

Re: flyingboozeman post# 57797

Friday, 11/02/2018 12:07:55 AM

Friday, November 02, 2018 12:07:55 AM

Post# of 96919
Hmmm. You're right. I guess I should have read the entire paragraph. Odd they mention Mediacom, but then redact the name of the newly mentioned supplier. Maybe they're trying to get those docs tossed?

I think Chanbond just hit them with everything to keep them busy while they're defending the other 3 suits, all of which take as much preparation as the case against the Delaware 13. And I think the 13, Arris and RPX are trying to get Chanbond so scattered they drop the ball.

I think it's been pretty evident for awhile now (at least a year) that defendants are trying to drag this out as long as possible and trip Chanbond up. Arris's suit is further evidence. Something tells me they knew they were out of jurisdiction and once the case is dismissed they will file in the proper court so Chanbond will just be defending their patents in perpetuity. They're just trying to distract Chanbond's attention away from the impending disaster the 13 ISPs are facing and Chanbond is stalling for time with the document overload.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.