InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 161
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/04/2010

Re: None

Thursday, 11/01/2018 11:22:04 AM

Thursday, November 01, 2018 11:22:04 AM

Post# of 731932
Live at hearing:

Rosen speaking: " last time we were here you asked us to submit an order, other counsel countered, your honor if I may hand out chart of employee claims that were submitted to FDIC, debtors 1,
claims that were submitted some were second and some were first and second, each were already submitted"

Rosen is going through each claim individually, starting w/Vodo. Arguing why each is invalid.

Rosen is talking about attorney's fees, Wash or Cal statute, he's quoting a previous Walrath decision that supports his argument that atty fees not allowed.

Rosen "atty fees would not qualify under either Wash or Cal statute. Claimants are just now getting to this, but too late. Mr. Kyle didn't even represent these people when we paid then on CWRAP?"

Rosen "Certain claimants were pro se back in 2013."
"Lions share of claims were disallowed so we are actually due atty fees".
Rosen arguing how LT is probably due atty fees.
Rosen "claimants arguing how they own vested equity interests. FDIC addressed all this"

Rosen "2 claimants Derekowski and Fergeson did not qualify because they were not dealt w/by FDIC. Not employed at time of seizure"
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News