Great Post DoniBoy. This is exactly what I am saying. Why outright call someone a fraud and say it as a fact when it hasn't been proven? Atleast be fair to the man and give him a chance to show to the court his side of things. If this is a scam, and proven so in the court I will be the first one to call Harris a conman, scammer, thief, forger, and fraud, however IMO he is none of these things, and should not be called one until its proven.
I'd rather keep my mouth shut, and wait for the court to make a decision rather then jumping to conclusions and calling a possibly innocent man trying his best to help shareholders, a fraud. What harm does it do in waiting? Some of you on the otherhand have no problem jumping to conclusions and skipping over the court to slander this guy and his family, which is not right. IMO. The facts are, no matter how this turns out, noone can buy or sell shares so there is no reason not to wait and give him the benefit of the doubt.