InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,751.07
(
0.90%
)
US TECH 100
19,476.00
(
1.10%
)
Dow Jones
42,352.75
(
0.81%
)
Brent Oil
77.97
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
62,401.12
(
0.52%
)
Post# of 96915
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

zombywolf

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 190
Posts 14552
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/06/2003

zombywolf

Re: rbd1 post# 57438

Friday, 10/26/2018 1:53:13 PM

Friday, October 26, 2018 1:53:13 PM

Post# of 96915
60/40 Chanbond. I would be more tilted toward Chanbond, but the appeal is of a subjective decision. There was no issue with the claims, but they were kicked because of a judge "opinion" that anyone with a HS education could have invented the process those claims cover. This crap is all over IP infringement cases, judges voting opinions instead of fact. Some of the judge's at the CAFC are technically inept, so you win or lose depending on the ones you draw for a case.

All information provided is the opinion of this poster from review of information in the public domain.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up