InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1092
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2018

Re: jobynimble post# 106686

Wednesday, 10/24/2018 11:29:28 PM

Wednesday, October 24, 2018 11:29:28 PM

Post# of 192119
Yes, sort of...

Do you really think FUSZ would trade 4x higher just because it would be NASDAQ-listed? Ugh...


Here's why:
1. NASDAQ has access to a plethora of investment money, simply unavailable in the OTC. That doesn't mean the money is guaranteed to roll in, but with the right set of interesting valuation points, the probability is quite reasonable.
2. Sound Concepts, a currently private company, going to NASDAQ without nFusz would certainly attract investors, but coupling the two companies together is likely to garner logarithmically scaled interest.
3. The nFusz management team are well connected, to investors that also will not participate in the OTC. Additionally, they are certain to have followers for which they have no direct connection.
4. There may be new partnerships that might potentially also be 'activated' in step with an uplisting, and therefore have subsequent PRs released, thereby accelerating the SP. This item is my own speculation based on the assorted knowledge most here have of what is projected, I'm simply suggesting the careful coordination with the uplist timing.

AGP knows far more on each of these considerations than any public investor. To my knowledge, they have shown no sign of dissolving their contract with nFusz. The marketability of underwriters is soundly rooted in their success to uplist with proper valuation, I do believe that if they thought nFusz were going to tarnish that reputation, they'd be out.

So Yes, sort of... not simply due to the uplisting event, but due to integrated/related activity. None of this is certain, after all, investing IS gambling, but some hands bode better than others and I think nFusz deserves to be played out.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VERB News