InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 3311
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/21/2010

Re: None

Wednesday, 10/24/2018 10:44:21 AM

Wednesday, October 24, 2018 10:44:21 AM

Post# of 30011
JL states:
"Alongside with a CRIMINAL clamp down, to the ones that sued MY JUDGE in 2007 Civil and 2010 CRIMINAL with lies and fabrications that Barrick owned TESOROS via MINERA NEVADA SpA 2010. Criminal charges were laid by MSX successful 2013 v TESOROS owner due to this scandal and duplication of his lies to NOT KNOW and TO BE AN EMPLOYEE of ABX. Wow! "

I know I still keep coming back to this. Over on Stockhouse The Stacker showed court, errrr, translated language that these dual positions were simple court accepted nuances and did not have any material consequences as Llanos was an employee of Barrick and had always INTENDED to transfer ownership to Barrick via CMN AT SOME POINT IN TIME??????

There needs to be a reason for Llanos to have changed his position as to what his relationship was with CMN,from not being employed or an agent or knowing and that of being totally independent??????

What is that reason??????????????????????????????????

movie at 11:00
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.