InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,106.05
(
1.14%
)
US TECH 100
17,256.80
(
1.64%
)
Dow Jones
38,288.76
(
0.53%
)
Brent Oil
88.20
(
0.05%
)
Bitcoin
64,016.87
(
-0.73%
)
Post# of 96901
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Evilbean

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 14
Posts 765
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/25/2017

Evilbean

Re: None

Monday, 10/22/2018 3:00:41 PM

Monday, October 22, 2018 3:00:41 PM

Post# of 96901
PTAB comment:

“we agree with Petitioner that it would have been within the ability of an ordinarily skilled artisan at the time of invention to use a wired 41 IPR2016-01744 Patent 7,941,822 B2 input in place of a wireless input “

Conclusion:

For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that Petitioner has shown, by
a preponderance of the evidence, that claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 19, 20, 23, and 29 of the ’822 patent are unpatentable.

https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1469056/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYmM4MTRkODEtNjI0OS00YmI1LTg0NDUtNjMwNTg4MWYzMGFkOzEuMA====/anonymousDownload
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up