VirTra Inc (VTSI)

[sbc357]

Of course they do. You sure do try to muddy the waters in favor of the directors, don't you.
Kelly is not in a position anymore to make decisions that will dilute our investments into oblivion like the directors are at this point in time. So quit trying to put the ball in his hands; he cannot serve it, he can only bat it around enough to direct the conversations toward a full spectrum of possible concerns. Oviously, those concerns will focus on his also, personal and businesswise. You are not being wise to think that they would not address his concerns (or imply that us other shareholders would not think such).

Our attention should be focused on the board members and their present AND PAST character and decisions. After all, the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, and I take THAT very seriously. Their past behavior does not appear to have been behavior we can trust. Notice, I said "appear", I have not decided for sure if it does indicate concerns for mistrust or not. I certainly would like them to have enough respect for the position us shareholders have been in the last 6 months to come out and tell us their perspectives on what had unfolded regarding the differences of opinions about how best to operate the company, or to sell it off to some other interested party. Them being quiet on this matter makes me most suspicious now, and will probably get me to vote no, because it tells me they did not have justifiable enough reasons to elaborate to us shareholders in the open. They do not have faith that us retail sharehodlers would see the benefits of their decisions the past 6 to 10 mmonths. Now, why would I trust another 400MM shares with someone with that past behavior history?
If they have a good enough explanation, then I would probably vote yes, since I have started to move to that direction with all the other developments of late.