InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1242
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/07/2006

Re: JNdouble1 post# 152730

Tuesday, 09/25/2018 1:06:08 PM

Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:06:08 PM

Post# of 329593
You're right, it was definitely a traditional 510k.

From Sree

Thank you for your message. The 510(k) that was filed does combine indications from the previous 510(k), which is why we are asking for "expanded" indications. The word "traditional" in the 510(k) is just to indicate the type of application prepared, as there are only three types. Seeking expanded indications automatically requires a "traditional" 510(k), since the other two types are for device modifications etc.