InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 798
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2018

Re: None

Tuesday, 09/25/2018 10:09:05 AM

Tuesday, September 25, 2018 10:09:05 AM

Post# of 41321
Comparing the 'alleged' Zimmer H1 implant and C+CSC. Notice on H1 the,what i assume, Hydroxyapatite tricalcium phosphate coating on the bone fusion surfaces. This suggests to me poor fusion rates of Aluminum oxide ceramic. Not trying to throw AMDA under the bus on trade secrets, but looking at C+CSC I would expect a darker color if the porous insert was pure Silicon Nitride. Doped synthetic allograft material would add certain advantages over the traditional HA +tricalcium phosphate, such as antibacterial. If true we wouldnt need a research study to determine advantages between genoss and C+CSC in my opinion. It would be pretty obvious C+CSC would outcompete.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SINT News