InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 261
Posts 19732
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/03/2004

Re: rubellite0013 post# 4902

Sunday, 10/29/2006 5:01:24 PM

Sunday, October 29, 2006 5:01:24 PM

Post# of 63795
Thanks Rube. That makes sense, although I understand that the materials for the energy product come from the byproduct of fertilizer production. Therefore, the source material cost is offset by fertilizer production. Two sources of income from the same product with near 100% usage seems like a cheap alternative provided the cost of fossil fuels and other sources remain above $1.25 a gallon. I have not seen numbers here that are particularly convincing since they are all over the place with estimates from free materials to more costly than whatever. Nonetheless, bio-source fuels are the way to greater energy independence, and provided the government steps up and places requirements for at least partial replacement of fissil fuels we should see great success here in the future. However, keep in mind that fossil fuel prices are artificially high and a reduction in world oil demand of only 20%, or an increase in offsetting new sources, could easily drive oil prices back under $30.

doc.feelgoode@yahoo.com

"It ain't what they call you, it's what you answer to." --WC Fields