InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 196
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/30/2017

Re: None

Monday, 09/17/2018 12:34:22 PM

Monday, September 17, 2018 12:34:22 PM

Post# of 96904
No. 17-1686
================================================================
In The
Supreme Court of the United States
---------------------------------
RPX CORPORATION,
Petitioner,
v.
CHANBOND LLC,
Respondent.
---------------------------------
On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari
To The United States Court Of Appeals
For The Federal Circuit

REPLY BRIEF FOR PETITIONER

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/17/17-1686/62700/20180905121140319_RPX%20v%20Chanbond%20-%20Petition%20Reply%20Brief.pdf


In short, Respondent’s position on the power of Congress to control agency action in this matter is in stark contrast with the position of RPX. Respondent argues in effect that there is nothing Congress can do by statute to create a private right, which when deprived by an agency, constitutes an injury in fact sufficient for Article III standing. According to Respondent, a party either has standing based on facts outside of any statute or they do not. That is the same position taken by the Court of Appeals below. RPX disagrees. This case is a good vehicle for resolving this important question.

CONCLUSION
The petition should be granted.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.