Yes, there is the chance that you are wrong and there is just as much a chance that VLDI goes to zero. I don't think most here refute the historical aspects of VLDI. This is a sub-penny, SPECULATIVE and very RISKY play. That's the whole FUN of playing this game!!
How each individual plays this game is up to them. How many times have you seen me state way in the past, on this very board, that this is just a crap shoot?
You can continue to bring up the historical aspects, but Gorgal's successful testing leads me to believe that my odds of winning are becoming a bit better than the house's. I'm betting on a roll of the dice in the future, past rolls mean nothing, they've already been played, they're done and over with no matter how many times the film is rewound.
_________________________________________
I learned a long time ago in the stock market to always expect the unexpected. Also if something does not make sense it is usually time to get out.
__________________________________________
Agree, but here again, Gorgal's successful testing of VP makes sense. I just cannot bring myself to believe that was for nothing and yet, I could be very wrong but this testing is why I've decided to stay in this thing for as long as it takes, way out of my "normal" thinking for penny stocks which I stated.
I don't know where VLDI's price may go, I can't even begin to guesstimate such a thing. I just believe that the odds are beginning to turn away from the house and into my favor. I'll continue to let my bet ride for the time being.
From my past experience and familiarity with IT cybersecurity issues, IF this thing does turn out to be a winner, it could be extraordinary. Relational databases were "radical" in their day, just some college professor's wet dream on how to do things, yet Oracle, Microsoft and a host of others have profited rather well on relational theory. VP, with its "radical" technology may, just may go down the same road to glory.
AI
