InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 321
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/30/2002

Re: Conrad post# 9660

Saturday, 09/13/2003 3:00:22 PM

Saturday, September 13, 2003 3:00:22 PM

Post# of 47146
Hi Conrad, the problem is also known by the name 'bracket creep', and that is virtally gone, see the succesive sell-buy levels (last column is portfolio value when the price returns to 10, starting at 10000+5000):

11.67 - 9.02 - 15071.81
11.67 - 9.01 - 15197.52
11.67 - 9.00 - 15329.10
11.65 - 9.00 - 15461.35
11.64 - 8.99 - 15593.15
11.63 - 8.99 - 15727.72
11.63 - 8.98 - 15862.29
11.61 - 8.96 - 15997.55
11.59 - 8.96 - 16138.35
11.59 - 8.95 - 16278.11

As 50% moves the bracket upward and my 24% moves it very slowly downward, 24% is just a little bit on the low side for 'stationary brackets'.

I don't like constant minimum trades in the context of GTC orders for AIM. This will make the bracket contract as PC and PV gain. That is why I choose a percentage of PC. Of course, in setting this % you observe points like commissions etcetera. Because in AIM PC can only grow, after that it is no longer a problem.

Regards,

Karel

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.