InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 803
Posts 27238
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2013

Re: AD2000 post# 62

Thursday, 09/06/2018 5:31:15 PM

Thursday, September 06, 2018 5:31:15 PM

Post# of 22036
CWEB is way undervalued in comparison to TLR*Y in a similar space. CWEB's products are hemp derived CBD and TLR*Y's is MJ derived CBD.

Basic Facts:

TLR*Y

Revenues = $17.5 million for 6 months ending June 2018

OS = 76.5 million

Current MC = $7.46 billion

Estimated 2018 revenues = $35 million (based on first six months' revenues and extrapolate to 12 months)

PPS = $80 US dollars

https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/quote/TLRY/financials?p=TLRY

CWEB

Revenues = $30.3 million for 6 months ending June 2018

https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/quote/CWEB.CN/financials?p=CWEB.CN

Current OS = 15.17 million based on IBOX info.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/Charlottes-Web-Holdings-Inc-CNSX-CWEB-36138/

Current MC = OS X PPS = 15.17 million X $9.19 (PPS = $12.10 Canadian dollars converted at $.76 US exchange rate) = $139.4 million in US dollars.

Estimated 2018 revenues = $60.6 million (based on first six months' revenues and extrapolate to 12 months)

PPS = $9.19 US dollars ($12.10 Canadian).

Huge PPS discrepancy between CWEB and TLR*Y. CWEB's revenues are 1.73X revenues of TLR*Y's ($60.6m/$35m), but PPS is only at $9.19 vis-a-vis TLR*Y's PPS of $80.00

Its a matter of time, the PPS for CWEB makes a parabolic move north based on its strong fundamentals and brand recognition. The hemp legalization bill if passed would only add fuel to the rocket ship.

$CWEB$

Disclosure: This is just my opinion, not intended for investment advice. Do your own DD before trading/investing in the market.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CWBHF News