InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 90
Posts 18106
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2006

Re: sbarn post# 187894

Thursday, 08/30/2018 5:53:51 PM

Thursday, August 30, 2018 5:53:51 PM

Post# of 732214
Well, I would think the patient who was both alive and dead might have been a mistake. Or do we think Shrodenger was one of the investigators smile

Dcvax-L was also a mistake.

The 3 excluded patients were the ones who were considered statistical outliers in the peer reviewed paper. Making a post hock definition of "poorly differentiated" thus dropping three poor performers was not a mistake. I agree there.

The one "non evaluable" was humorous. They were first dead, then lost, now non-evaluable due to a manufacturing error.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News