80 cases lost? RCMP, Interpol, FBI, arrest the crook.
How about one case where Barrick and BCSC became a legal defendant in Chile ahead of the last MSX Hearing?
making it HIGHLY RELEVANT to BCSC and liar Executive Director June and July 4-10 when both BCSC and Executive Director became defendants in Chile in a case where he owes me CH$3Billion due to my CORRECT BUSINESS with MSX? They call it IRRELEVANT July 11, 2018 at BCSC Hearing?
How callous in the brain do crooks get when trapped?
BCSC may not be allowed to tell the Chile Judge as FIRST WORLD that the magistrate has NO JURISDICTION over a crook that helped Barrick to defraud Chile, MSX, MWR and this Canadian and Chilean miner.
Not and never by paying a false witness deposition which runs contrary to the Chilean mining legislation and laws. That is tampering with evidence.
Not by stealing MSX and my evidence. That is tampering.
Not by telling magistrates in Chile to declare themselves unable to rule on what was amply consulted with Canada as there was no previous jurisprudence on the matter.
Canada onliged all matters to process re: Subpoena to BCSC 2017
BCSC told the Chilean Judge that is calling them, declare yourself out of jurisdiction I am first world who pays your cheques? a USD1.1.05 total in the case of Barrick invested over three decades? Are you proud BCSC?
We had ample legal consultations from Chile before Canadian Embassy in Santiago de Chile and Global Affairs Canada accepted to due process the Most Excelelent Supreme Court of Chile ordered International Subpoena.
Ministry of Justice and Attorney general of BC alongside legal services Department obliged via Sheriff o f vancouver November 10, 2017.
BCSC Executive Director and Councils knew that, had copies, sought Chilean legal Council, got Chile Council via Chilean Consulate and before that June 2018 consulting with Chile they must have rendered ny legal action in Chile very highly RELEVANT to BCSC!! during June 2018.
Why did the July 11, 2018 Hearing did not get suspended by BCSC? Why MSX was told its evidence of the international Subpoena was IRRELEVANT?
Why did BCSC Councils for Executive Director did not withdraw their statements like the LIAR WITNESS withdrew his credentials of MINING EXPERT LAWYER from Chile? To be a Civil liar who made my late brother to walk into, defend and lose a Supreme court decision, after being dead?
They lost self respect and respect for the public and others in a mad run to improperly own mining riches in Chile. Foolishly thinking that NO TITLE means no legal ownership rights of the areas. As ruled amply.
Barrick went after 1996 titles for the kill to delay justice, so did TSX and BCSC v. MWR and v. MSX to serve Barrick and its criminal theory.
My rights do exist over mineral areas covered by UTM in Chile under the rule of Chilean law and its magistrates, not under BCSC rule as sought.
BCSC denied to MSX that the Subpoena was in English or ever received by BCSCcalling the mysterious Chile decision a FABRICATION and FICTION.
Yet they crawled to the Chilean Consulate to bind BCSC via its Executive Director ahead of the last MSX case closing Hearing and HID THE TRUTH from MSX and the MAGISTRATES declared the SUBPOENA irrelevant?
When it had already being DEFENDED by BCSC as a branch of the Ministry of Finance of BC?
Is there NO DECENCY to the filth and trash that Executive Director peddles to BC and the public?
He hurt BCSC, MSX, MSX shareholders, the public, Canada and my family.
Is spending taxpayers cash silently trying to give orders to chilean magistrates to APPROVE HIS FRAUD? Watch out BCSC, you are just ANOTHER BARRICK in the big concert of things in Chile, legal CO 0 DEFENDANTS.
So my Subppoena WAS RELEVANT, so RELEVANT that BCSC had to HIDE IT from MSX at the Hearing, alongside my EVIDENCE, EXHIBITS, I WILL SAY and proof over 150 pages stolen from the process by Councils tat DID NOT RECEIVE IT was received extemporaneous *a lie of BCSC insiders involved) or was all in Spanish and nothing in English ANOTHER FALSEHOOD.
BCSC is in a huge pickle of LIES and forcing a VICTIM OF ASSAULT paid by BCSC insiders TO DECLARE UNDER A SUBPOENA... crooks learn fast, eh?
What good does it do to LOOK FOR EVIL when Option cash is NOT REFUNDABLE by me but by BCSC, its bosses and Barrick to me, as per judgement over the LIBEL in Chile,m interim to REAL PUBITIVE DAMAGES CASES under way?.
Look for 10 Billion stolen via CLOSING MSX and MWR with a totla investment of USD1.05. My demonstrable loss at 2016 when action was launched successfully v. BCSC in Chile was over the USD5 million equivalent awarded in the case.
I find it hard that a Civil servant from Canada that hoodwinked the establishment, will force a Chilean magistrate to not give orders in his Court. Specially when they are accomplices of the crimes of Barrick.
The only rights over the mineralized areas that are valid are mine.
TESOROS was bought by Barrick 2018 however was ordered to die by Madam justice 2006, she ws sued in FALSE TESTIMONY duplicated by BCSC 2018.
The game of justice is on. BCSC Executive Director is welcome to spare his Chile trip by facing off with me at RCMP - IMET Vancouver HQ, so he may be arrested in Canada instead.
My name is at the top of the page and my live Trial in Chile has nabbed BCSC insiders acting like a MAFIA with Barrick v. MSX and me.
Go ahead, Barrick and BCSC, charge me with libel for telling the truth.
