Attention RCMP-IMET, INTERPOL, FAS, SCOTLAND YARD, Barrick has a new SEC - NYSE investigative file.
Humpty Dumpty has fallen from its wall.
NYSE case file: CC02745966 - BARRICK GOLD Influence Peddling and Racketeering
In Chile the case v. Barrick and BCSC has begun.
BCSC Executive Director confessed he depends on the new defendants to be August 2018. Ministry of Finance of BC and Ontario next Chile defendants.
With a mass of crooked ex politicians that did nothing, yet they are together 2018 at posh law firms of the land defending crooked miners and dirty energy companies?. From crooked politicians to crooked lawyers?
As crooked as BCSC insiders next to be removed to a corner with a tall hat while their employer Minister of Finance takes the floor at last.
It so happens that ridiculous BCSC Executive Director ordered via his Council that Chilean Judge declares himself OUT OF JURISDICTION and INCOMPETENT to take to Trial the crooked Civil servant.
BCSC does not OBEY the laws of Canada and in Chile they shall have to obey the laws of Chile under which MWR, MSX and me contracted.
Chile had ample consultation with its jurists and Canada.
BCSC denied that the International Subpoena existed, was valid, attested that IT had never been delivered to BCSC, Roy Leon or Romolo di Fonzo.
Yet weeks before the last MSX Hearing the Chile Trial WAS BEEN defended by BCSC via Chile law firm, Notary Public, BC President of Notary Public Association and Consulate of Chile ahead of the last MSX Hearing to wrap its Trial v. MSX and me.
Why did BCSC hire a Chile lawyer to defend? Because IT WAS RELEVANT.
Why does BCSC spends BC taxpayers money in Chile? Because it is RELEVANT
Why the signature of Chile Consul needed by BCSC in Vancouver when stepping in Chilean territory and laws? Because my subpoena is RELEVANT.
Why if BCSC started seeking lawyer in Chile June 2018 and accomplished legal defense docuemnts from Chilean Consul ahead of last MSX Hearing, the liar BCSC Executive Director via its liar lawyer DENIED that the International Subpoena was RELEVANT?.
Did BCSC count on the fact it could silently defend and toss out the magistrates in their Court to beat MSX and me in Chile and Canada in one easy LEGAL APPLICATION in abuse of Power and thievery of tax payers cash?
Last Hearing v. MSX and me should have been suspended by the sole Ministry of the Law and it was not, which indicates CRIMINAL FRAMING in Canada for MSX,, MSX shareholders and invested money, by derilect criminally oriented crooked employees of the Ministry of Finance of BC.
If BCSC was spending money to DEFEND in Chile it is because my legal action has them gillnetted with Barrick at a transaction where billions were scammed from USA and Canada to CAYMAN ISLANDS to a corporation of a Canadian Lawyer of LAC MINERALS that sold hersel and crooked Accountant of LAC the corporation and business of BARRICK CHILE.
Barrick Gold Corporation of Canada and USA only own 0.000001% of PASCUA LAMA and 0% of MINA PASCUA CHILE my asset after investing USD1.05.
The rest went to prop socialist governments in Latin America friends of the friends of Barrick via pillaged exchanges cash at CAYMAN ISLANDS with SAN JOSE INC of St Joe Minerals as cover.
USD1.05 hurts so much as TOTAL CAPITAL INVESTED in Chile by BCSC and TSX defended, that it is impossible for BCSC to remove the Judges that ORDERED their appearance in Chile. Chile is NOT the MSX Board where clowns say something that is not true and IT should bind MSX investors.
Chile is a sound legal jurisdiction whereat three levels of justice found that BCSC insiders and Barrick had defrauded Chile, MWR, MSX and me.
How dare BCSC defends in Chile and calls before me IRRELEVANT my case?
It is so RELEVANT that I shall issue a force Chile appearance to BCSC Executive Director in kind, under arrest warrant if he repeats the contempt of his employees and decides to NOT show up.
How dare BCSC Executive Director insults Chile calling its favorite son, me, NOT TIED TO CHILE? I am tied to Chile via IUS TERRA right, IUS SANGUINIS right, MINER INDUSTRIALIST right, born citizen right, passport and ID carrier right 2018. BCSC thinks that DENIAL by them and Barrick is the law of the land in Canada and Chile?. Think again...
How dare does BCSC claim that it is FIRST WORLD and implies Chile to be second or third world WAITING FOR THEIR CHEQUES to invest in mining?
USD1.05 like Barrick at Pascua Lama perhaos? SHAME on BCSC.
It gave MSX no time or EXTENSION at the hearing. Why the premeditated CRIME? Because BCSC would have been OUT OF LEGAL TIME to answer my trial in chile and HAD TO PAY FAST. Hence it hid the proceedings at Chilean Consulate of Vancouver and moed to DISQUALIFY THE JUDGE that ORDERED the appearance of BCSC employees in Chile?
Wink wink wink NO ONE SHALL NOTICE?
BCSC has committed ITS LAST CRIME on the file of Barrick in Canada.
This is a CRIME OF OMISSION v. MSX, its shareholders, its lenders, its investors and me June and July 2018 weeks and days ahead of the last Hearing, were they DENIED AN EXTENSION that was due to MSX, to connaive v. MSX and me, in full DENIAL OF THE FACTS that at such point BCSC was already a DEFENDANT of RELEVANT PROPORTIONS a first for Canada and Chilean history.
BCSC had its criminal holidays v. MSX and me to try to COVER UP the peddling of a FALSE PASCUA LAMA PROSPECTUS by Barrick and SILVER WHEATON two prominent fee payers to the ministry of Finance of BC and Ontario.
Never mind that the cash was stolen. If MWR was left without cash at TSX Barrick would win. If BCSC left MSX without Trade the property titles were to be lost. Right? Wrong!!! The MINING RIGHT is alive.
There is NO RETROACTIVE RIGHT for BCSC after Barrick bought TESOROS from UNDA LLANOS 2018. Never after lifting the Injunction 2018 for titles at TSX or BCSC as done in PONZI SCAM PYRAMID.
UNDA LLANOS was not an AGENT of Barrick as sustained by BCSC v. MSX and me, as that was DENIED by UNDA 2018 in Chile Tribunals and since 2001 at Trial and Injunction C-1912-2011.
My brother WAS NOT ALIVE when BCSC and its LIAR Chile witness have my brther defending and losing before the Most Excellent Supreme Court of Chile case 719-2011 of 2nd Civil court of Vallenar. Where UNDA changed his testimony from NOT KNOW 1995-2012 to EMPLOYEE of Barrick.
Hence MSX launched todate successful CRIMINAL CHARGES v. UNDA LLANOS now in full process of being expanded to include all TSX and BCSC crooks that touched my files and MWR + MSX files.
The final chapters of the mobie are incredible in law terms as check mate.
The list of crooks at the end of the movie will have to be one sentence per crook and small photo to last 30 minutes gto one hour. All prominent bankers, politicians, crooked corporate thugs, and thieves that bribed astute politicians and powerful civil servants for the TAX PARADISE RACKET.
Ther is no way that my name or my clients name shall LAUNDER the filth.
My name is at the top and BCSC Executive Director is welcome to fight it out at RCMP - IMET Vancouver, loser goes to JAIL I return to my children.
