InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 109
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/26/2018

Re: nyt post# 58034

Thursday, 07/26/2018 7:39:37 PM

Thursday, July 26, 2018 7:39:37 PM

Post# of 130854
I think the patents combined with the IPR wins ARE ENOUGH to warrant a licensing deal or buyout, but I don't see a licensing deal happening because the alleged infringers are "innocent until proven guilty" and will continue to fight in court until a judge rules against them. Why buy something you don't need unless a judge says you need it because you broke patent law? We don't put people in jail unless they are proven guilty in a court of law, or admit guilt. Same concept applies here, IMO.

And, I think a buyout COULD be possible but only AFTER the PTAB has rejected apples request for rehearing. I think DB had a valid point that it's possible some potential buyer has been combing the books to make sure everything is legit...and there could be an offer but only after the PTAB rules in our favor. I think that's all very plausible. Of course, there is no one that can provide proof that there might be a deal pending. Just speculation at this point.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VPLM News