InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 168
Posts 22132
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2006

Re: ki2002rom post# 81119

Tuesday, 07/10/2018 2:54:30 PM

Tuesday, July 10, 2018 2:54:30 PM

Post# of 192661
I don't think you are getting what I mean about the transparency. The price never would be at 50 cents in the first place if investors didn't perceive Rory to be a transparent CEO. And it wouldn't have gone up to over $3 without that either. It is a big part of the reason people bought the stock.

Yes the price dropped even while he remained transparent but that's because things didn't go through as people expected. The week of Oracle was great for you but it SUCKED for investors - no joint PR was a big thing - it was greatly anticipated to validate the excitement of Oracle. Rory tried to counter with a video but it just wasn't enough. And then soon after that we got - no Hawaii - then $8k in revs - those things SUCKED for investors. Transparency or not.

But we have believers like you and even like myself who still place value on the transparency. That value goes down the longer the silence continues and the price reflects it. That G_d for the emails at least.

CUIN2 wants no SHACS. Can you imagine if the company had never put out a SHAC or email and only put out PRs and 8ks? I think the price would be far lower than today's price. People LIKE and TRUST Rory. That's because of the SHACs more than ANYTHING else.

My philosophy is to just be honest and balanced, and let the market decide if it agrees or not.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent VERB News