Neah has been dark for more than a year.
Keep in mind that in March of 2017 they had no money to do anything.
By Sep 2017 they had batteries to test, this is a fact because we can see a stack of pouch batteries and trays of button batteries in the safety video.
Lets assume these batteries have 5 times the power densities than regular lithium-ion batteries have.
How long would it take to get 300 charge/discharge cycles ? How long for 500 or 1000 cycles ?
If restarting the process with a newer, larger, stacked battery say for a vehicle, take 4 to 6 months to build one and then to start testing and working out bugs, it could easily be a year before significant results can be verified relating to the number of charge and discharge cycles and to battery life and efficiency.
This is why I was saying we may still be here in the same spot in a year. To us it's the same spot, to them, its more time with batteries under test, more cycles that can be proven and a wider difference between the XNRGI battery and the rest of the world.
You can't get funding from an outlandish claim, you have to be able to prove that claim. Too many labs and too many Universities with wild claims that then go quiet because the real world and the lab are two very different places.
No we do not where they are relating to scale , customers, or funding, but they have built batteries and if they have them then it can be assumed they are continuously testing them.
JMHO
Bill
