Max Sound Corporation (MAXD)

[Long-vestor]

'Fidelity Scores MAXD'

Speaking of nonsense, Fidelity scores don't cover stinkies and scams.

Nonsense Criminal Halpern talked the same talk, the same walk when shorting ZTRIM in toxic and thefts. Stealing, pillaging and out right bogus legal suit over the patent rights. Pumping the net with nonsense on a patent he'd tried to steal.

Then when the whole mount of Poop fell, Criminal Halpern loaded up his bag with more than 10 million Dollars in Ztrim's stock and bailed because, here's where the SEC had finally caught up to Criminal Halpern as well. AMEX Kicked him and band of boiler room cons out of the AMEX due to insider theft and various cover-ups involving the boiler pack, plus;

"-- Failure to report in the Company's filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission ("SEC") that certain officers and directors of the
Company had failed to timely and/or completely file certain of their
SEC Forms 3, 4 and 5, in violation of Sections 134 and 1101 of the
Guide. The Amex staff noted approximately 30 instances involving a
total of 9 reporting persons over the past 5 years that Forms 3, 4 or 5
were not completely or timely filed.

-- Failure by the Company's board of directors to subject a certain
related party transaction to review by the Audit Committee, in
violation of Section 120 of the Guide.

-- Granting certain stock options in a manner that is contrary to the
terms of the Company's stock option plans, in violation of Section 711
of the Guide. Specifically, the Amex staff noted 17 stock option
grants for an aggregate of 1,825,000 shares where the exercise price
was lower than the fair market value on the date of grant, and two
stock option grants for an aggregate of 1,605,000 shares to the
Company's then CEO with an exercise price equal to the fair market
value on the date of grant as opposed to 110% of fair market value as
required by the Company's stock incentive plans.

-- Failure to properly account for the stock option grants with exercise
prices below fair market value by recording non-cash compensation
charges on its income statements for the applicable periods, in
violation of Sections 134 and 1101 of the Guide.

-- Failure to provide certain information to the Amex that was reasonably
requested, in violation of Section 132(e) of the Guide.

-- In light of the foregoing deficiencies, that the Company has internal
control weaknesses that resulted in the Company and/or its management
engaging in operations which, in the opinion of the Amex, are contrary
to the public interest, in violation of Section 1003(f)(iii) of the
Guide."